Deutsch - translations provided by: www.tranexp.com Espanol - translations provided by: www.tranexp.com Français - translations provided by: www.tranexp.com Italiano - translations provided by: www.tranexp.com Portuguese - translations provided by: www.tranexp.com
                                                                                 Translate



 

Testimonials and  test results of the Fuel Saver 7000-MPG... why it really works

 

 


 

The Fuel Saver 7000-MPG was dyno tested and  road tested on a 2008 General Motors HHR 2.4 liter engine. Our thanks to Mr. Robert Beaty who financed and performed the following tests:

Dyno Test: GRADE - Improved
BEFORE: 171 hp 6200 163 tq 5000 stock
AFTER: 180 hp 6200 171 tq 5000 improved

Dyno Test Note: This was not simply a spike at the upper rpm. The additional power was from off idle all the way to red line. The Fuel Saver 7000 resolved a lean spot at 3300 rpm. This actually was 13 hp over stock at 3300 RPM’s.

 Road Test: GRADE -  Improved
45 mph - BEFORE: 34.1 MPG AFTER: 43.3 MPG
55 mph - BEFORE: 32.2 MPG AFTER: 41.1 MPG
65 mph - BEFORE: 30.1 MPG AFTER: 39.1MPG


 

 

   Diagrams are drawn to scale to closely represent air, vapor gas and liquid gas ratios.

 

 

 

In order to achieve the proper vapor to air fuel ratio on vehicles today, gasoline must first be broken down into vapor.  It takes about 2 parts liquid gas to produce one part vapor using the in order to achieve the manufacturers required 14.7 to 1 air to vapor ratio as illustrated in Diagram A. This VAPOR to air ratio is the standard ratio used around the world on all gasoline vehicles so as to produce fewer emissions and optimal engine performance. 

Side Note: Even so, this 2 to 1 liquid gas to vapor conversion mentioned above is a far cry from technology over the past 80 years introduced by a host of inventors that have produced vapor from liquid gasoline much more efficiently. Some of which, such as Charles Nelson Pogue was able to produce gas mileage results as high as 205 (two hundred five) MPG on the early Ford prototypes. What is interesting is how Standard Oil was a major financier of the Ford Motor Company. One can only speculate the reasons the Pogue carburetor was not installed as the standard fuel delivery system on Ford's vehicles as gas prices rapidly approach $4.00 per gallon in the USA and are well above that in other countries like Canada, Australia, Great Britain...and the list goes on. Don't be fooled into believing out of ignorance that this technology isn't available today. Please see our Secrets page for more information on this subject.

The Fuel Saver 7000  helps convert  liquid gasoline more efficiently into vapor gas for your engine using less gasoline as opposed to the 2 to 1 fuel delivery systems used currently.

The vapor introduced into the engine by the Fuel Saver 7000 is analyzed by the Oxygen sensor.  The 02 sensor intern sends this information to the computer signifying that the fuel ratio has changed to a rich mixture as illustrated in Diagram B.

The computer reduces the amount of liquid gasoline entering the engine through the fuel injectors to bring the rich mixture back to the manufacturers prescribed air to vapor ratio (14.7 to 1) as shown in Diagram C.

As a result of adding vapor from the Fuel Saver 7000-MPG, the liquid gas required to achieve the manufacturers recommended air to fuel ratio is reduced significantly. This equates to better fuel economy and  increased power (shown in diagram C as well as dyno and road posted above).

Because your engine is now maintaining the same 14.7 parts air to 1 part vapor ratio as prescribed by the auto manufacturers, the Fuel Saver 7000 will not adversely affect or harm your engine in any way.


2005 Test Results for the Fuel Saver Series

Fuel Concepts has been developing the Fuel Saver series of products since the mid 90's.

In 2005, we decided to asked a some customers to put our product to a test that would have a group of common procedures involved. As a result, we obtained a certain percentage of these tests completed and returned back by fax which we have posted here. You may view a copy of this test by clicking here.

The tests were done on both OBD1 ( used on all EFI and TBI pre 1995) and OBD2 (used on all vehicles from 1995-today ).

We have included certain controls in the test that we maintain offer a good representation of our product line. One test, by Mr. Robinson in Chicago was done over an 1100 mile stretch and Mr. Reum, from Olympia, Washington, who went a 3000 mile excursion. We only required a 100 mile minimum.

Below is a list of vehicles along with results achieved using the Fuel Saver 5000.

We have had many emails from customers telling of positive results, however, we felt a controlled test by our instructions were the best way to demonstrate the Fuel Saver's effectiveness. We feel that by offering you real results based on equal controls would offer you the customer a more fair and balanced representation of our product rather than just posting names with a bunch of hyped up spuriousness written by some web master.

Note: The Fuel Savers series (5000 & 7000) do NOT work on diesel motors.


 
 

Please click on the BLUE LINK in the boxes to see the PDF files of their documented results.

 
Earl Stacy
Yakima, Wa

1999 Toyota P/U 24 R Series
5.9 Lit. EFI
Before:23 MPG
After: 32 MPG


Increase
39.1%

Patrick Sullivan
Lacey, Wa

2001 GMC P/U  K2500
6.0 Lit. EFI
Before:11.5 MPG
After: 14.5 MPG


Increase
26.1%

Harlan Robinson
Chicago, Il

1993 Cadillac 
4.9 Lit. EFI
Before:11.7 MPG
After: 16.9 MPG

Increase
44.4%

Marcus Reum
Olympia, Wa


1990 Nissan P/U 
2.4 Lit. EFI
Before:30 MPG
After: 39 MPG

Increase
30.0%
Merlin Stacy
Lacey, Wa


1999 Dodge P/U 4x4 1500
5.9 Lit. EFI
Before:14 MPG
After: 18 MPG

Increase
28.6%


 

Copyright©2008 Fuel Concepts LLC - All rights reserved

Fuel Concepts' web site design, and all materials and products relating to the operation
of Fuel Concepts is protected by copyright and US Patent laws. No portion of this site, including the source code, may be reproduced or retransmitted under penalty of law